These and many other questions arise when exploring the development and documentation of a triage competency validation process. Answers to these questions are imperative, as they not only impact litigation that may arise, but are also essential for ensuring the highest quality patient care.
When determining triage competency, consider the following elements for your requirements.
As with other recommendations related to guidelines and policies, it is important to select competency criteria that are realistic for your work setting and patient demographic.
Triage competency should be evaluated at the point of hire and on an ongoing basis. This is the most common gap in triage competency assessment – assessment that is only performed at the point of hire. There is no guarantee that a nurse who demonstrated triage proficiency upon hiring will maintain the same level of practice five years into employment.
I have seen many organizations assume that once the orientation for triage box is "checked off," no additional requirements remain. Not only is this untrue, but The Joint Commission actually requires that competency be re-validated a minimum of every three years.
Practice standards change; evidence-based principles intertwine with our standing triage orders; and even the classification for immunocompromised patients changes. These are just a few examples that reinforce the need for ongoing education and current knowledge base maintenance to ensure excellence in triage practice.
It is necessary to develop a process to ensure that staff maintain the defined minimal competency level of triage. For example, compassion fatigue can develop over time; unacceptable work practices might creep in as time passes since their training; there is also the potential for lack of policy compliance and a disregard for attentive customer service. All of these can wreak havoc on the risk associated with your department.
You may identify some staff who excel and exceed competency expectations, while others may no longer be able to meet your minimum criteria. Remediation processes can be effective when tied to performance expectations and nursing job descriptions.
The bottom line regarding triage competency is this: What is the minimal level of skill your community deserves when they present at triage?
Consider the facts of this malpractice case against an ED nurse. Sandra triaged an 87-year-old female who presented with abdominal pain. Sandra had assigned the patient a triage level of 3, despite the fact that her documentation reflected a patient who was pale and diaphoretic with a blood pressure of 102/50 and a heart rate of 112.
The patient's appendix ruptured; she suffered an MI during surgery and died the following day. The family hired a legal firm and is seeking a claim against the hospital, the triage nurse, the nurse manager, and the ED physician.
During the deposition, the plaintiff's attorney claimed that there was no record of competency for triage in Sandra's employment file and asked about her qualifications to triage in 2008.
Clinical experience, in and of itself, does not prove or validate competency; it simply tells someone how many years you have worked in a particular field.
Don't wait for a deposition to address your organization's triage competency assessment. Document your requirements and validate them on an ongoing basis to best serve your patients and avoid litigation.