In a previous posting, “The Ultimate Loss Prevention Strategy: 4 Key Areas of Allocating Your Risk Management Budget,” we highlighted the importance of addressing Diagnosis-Related Adverse Events. As an extension of that article, Dr. Tom Syzek and I provide further detail for justifying that recommendation and the recent data surrounding diagnostic errors, after which we will outline three key attributes of successful initiatives that have led to positive results.
Thoracic aortic dissection (TAD) is one of the most dramatic and life-threatening conditions encountered in all of medicine. Every year in the United States, there are an estimated 6,000 to 10,000 cases of TAD. Since it is an uncommon condition compared to the 5 million ED chest pain visits and more than 1 million acute myocardial infarctions, most physicians have diagnosed and treated only a few patients with TAD during their careers.
Ever since the Institute of Medicine’s report To Err is Human was released in 2000, healthcare has seen a surge in patient safety initiatives. Analysis of medical errors has become increasingly widespread, with several different methods being used by hospitals and practitioners. Of these methods, I suggest that cognitive error analysis may prove to be one of the most valuable in determining the real underlying reasons for medical errors that lead to unexpected adverse patient outcomes.
We've featured a variety of topics, cases, and missed diagnoses on our blog this year, and we hope that you've found the content useful and relevant.
In case you missed some of 2016's most popular posts, here are the top 10 articles from the blog this year, according to our website visitor statistics. What was your favorite article?
